headermask image

header image

Forthcoming blog silence

The lights will largely be off around here for the next couple weeks. My wife and I are embarking on our long anticipated trip to the Baltic. (The sea, not the town north of Sioux Falls.)

I am going sans laptop not because of seizure concerns but because there will be much more interesting diversions. For example, our arrival in Tallinn, Estonia, on July 4 is in the midst of the annual Õllesummer (Beer Summer), one of the largest festivals in the Baltics. We will also spend three days in St. Petersburg so, given the amount of airplane and airport time that’s ahead (likely including experiences like my dear friend Opus), the trip’s primary reading selection is War and Peace.

Ooveedeemsya!


While abroad, the senses refuse to be burdened by the mundane.

Dave Bidini, Tropic of Hockey

Book Review: The Mirrored Heavens by David J. Williams

Although normally cast in the future, science fiction still tends to be built upon current or relatively recent events and the state of the world. That’s certainly the case with The Mirrored Heavens, the debut novel by David J. Williams. Williams uses terrorist threats, political battles, military branch rivalries and East-West distrust and tension as tools for a tale that combines military-flavored SF with a heavy dose of cyberpunk.

The Mirrored Heavens is set in 2110 on an Earth decimated environmentally and still feeling the ramifications of a nuclear war in the Middle East. The dominant political powers are the U.S. and a Eurasian coalition of Slavic countries and China. Those powers and the neutral Western European states run by commerce-oriented “Euro Magnates” have isolated their information systems from each other, including firewalls sealing off their cyberspace “zones.” The book focuses on the hunt for Autumn Rain, a mysterious terrorist organization which has destroyed the Phoenix Space Elevator, a joint project of the United States and the Eurasian Coalition as part of the détente of the Second Cold War.

Williams approaches the tale with three different storylines involving different pairings of individuals. One is Claire Haskell and Jason Marlowe. Hearkening to some of the best cyberpunk tradition, Claire is a “razor,” physically modified and trained to immerse herself into zones, including hacking into an enemy’s. Jason is a “mechanic,” a heavily armed and armored agent who can physically carry out missions facilitated by a razor hacking into and undermining opponents in the zones. Another razor-mechanic pairing exists with the Operative and his razor, Lynx. They are in search of a former fellow agent who has retired to the moon. While these groups are hunting Autumn Rain, Lyle Spencer, a undercover agent, is being blackmailed into helping Linehan, a rogue trying to escape the United States.

Using the different storylines means The Mirrored Heavens has almost non-stop action. It seems as if at least one of the pairings is always engaged in blasting their way into or out of almost hopeless situations. As a result, the book seems the verbal equivalent of a first-person shooter video game. The action is hard-hitting, as well as highly destructive and widely fatal. It’s amazing the mechanics can carry as much ammo and explosives as they do. Of course, they need to given the fact they always are exceedingly outnumbered.

For those who love stories driven by descriptions of ferocious combat against great odds, The Mirrored Heavens is likely a success. The work also evokes some of the best of cyberpunk. It isn’t nearly as strong from other perspectives, though.

The characters are stiff and somewhat one-sided with their penchant for death and destruction. We see little of how the detailed future Williams has affected them other than in their official roles. Instead, that future often tends to be simply background and transition pieces for their battle royales. In addition, some of the lead characters occasionally speak in almost comic book terms with ponderous remarks like “Next stop Armageddon.”

Undoubtedly, the world of The Mirrored Heavens is vividly imagined. It is also explored in greater detail on the book’s website. Still, some of that wealth of information might have come in handy as background in the book itself. For example, a minor role player is the Jaguars, a terrorist organization in South America. It makes appearances here and there but is never really explored.

Finally, the infighting among and conspiratorial machinations of the various political and military players, as well as the individual characters, is convoluted. Often leaving the reader uncertain as to which side anybody is on or their ultimate goals, there are just too many wheels within wheels in the various plots and counterplots.

Still, given his splendid world creation, Williams has the ingredients for a long run of novels. He may reach a broader audience expanding the scope beyond the first-person shooter feel. Even if he sticks with nonstop action, there’s little doubt the state of the world and politics will be able to keep him fully supplied with potential storylines for his future Earth.


The sky’s been classified for fifty years now. Civilians can neither write nor film what they contain.

David J. Williams, The Mirrored Heavens

Book Review: The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing

It’s kind of a puzzle. How does a book reviewer review a how to book on book reviewing? More than other reviews, the reader may judge the book solely by the review itself. After all, since the reviewer just get done reading about writing book reviews doesn’t the quality of the review reflect the value of the book?

Underlying that question is the insurmountable obstacle faced by Mayra Calvani and Anne K. Edwards in their The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing. Any user’s manual can tell you the steps involved in an art, craft or hobby. Yet the end result ultimately hinges on how skillfully the tools are used, something beyond the control of the author of the user’s manual. That said, Calvani and Edwards provide a worthwhile reference and resource tool for those interested in book reviewing.

The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing is appropriately titled. As Calvani and Edwards observe throughout the book, reviewing can be a slippery slope. A desire to please or to remain on a publicist’s or publisher’s mailing list are a couple of the items that can impact the objectivity of any review. And Calvani and Edwards stress that there’s only one way off that slope: honesty.

This theme is reflected in the very first paragraph of the section of the book captioned “How to Write a Book Review.” It says simply, “First, read the book.” Particularly with the proliferation of blog and internet-based reviews, there are a number of reviews that repeat verbatim or with slight variation the publicity material sent out with the book. It seems to reflect an ethic, to use the term lightly, that getting a free book is more important than being honest with the reader of the review.

One of the best aspects of The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing is the emphasis on honesty and ethics in various issues that book reviewers can face. Yet that is far from all that Calvani and Edwards provide. The basics are there. Their five keys to book reviewing point out the crucial difference between bias and objectivity. They also outline the key components of critical reading and analysis. To the extent the book attempts to “teach” book reviewing, their use of sample reviews is a laudable approach, particularly when those samples are then compared to actually published reviews. They touch briefly on the print v. blogging review dust up and their extensive list of resources for getting reviews published may alone be worth the price of admission.

The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing may be a near-essential tool for someone thinking about or just starting to review books. Yet it can also serve as a handy reference and reminder for already published reviewers. As with all user’s manuals, though, the ultimate worth of book and the tools and tips it provides will hinge on the skills and talents of the individual user.


Honesty is what defines a reviewer’s trade.

Mayra Calvani and Anne K. Edwards, The Slippery Art of Book Reviewing

Weekend marginalia

It’s just been too nice to spend time staring at a computer screen so linkage has been sparse here lately. But there’s been various, perhaps rather eclectic, items recently I thought worth passing along:


[T]he line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago: 1918-1956

How to combat the announcer gap

Because the National Endowment for the Arts believes the number of working writers and authors in South Dakota dropped from 222 in 1990 to 190 in 2000, the NYT book blog asks, “Who is killing the writers of South Dakota?” But perhaps the real question is, “Who’s killing the announcers of South Dakota?”

According to a recent research report, Artists in the Workforce 1990-2005, at least the state is tied for fifth in the nation in “announcers” per 10,000 people. That’s right. In 2000, we had more announcers (”radio, television, public address systems, events”) employed in the state — 220 — than writers and authors. (In perhaps an indirect slam on my former profession, the term “writers and authors” does not include “technical writers, editors, or journalists.”)

Yet while the NYT is evidently worried about the 14 percent drop in writers, the study shows we experienced a 40 percent reduction in announcers (from 367 in 1990). And perhaps of even more concern to any self-respecting South Dakotan is that North Dakota ranks first in the nation in announcers per 10,000 people. Plainly, we are facing a critical announcer gap.

Some of our other rankings also leave cause for concern. We saw a 90 percent reduction in employed actors, from 44 to 4. But that’s better than the announcer bastion to the north. North Dakota dropped from 44 to 0 — that’s right, z-e-r-o — paid actors. (Of course, if you look closer, the NEA report says that when you take the margin of error into account there could be anywhere from zero to 227 paid actors in each state.)

In terms of percent of the workforce, here’s how South Dakota ranked as of 2000: photographers (9th); entertainers and performers (12th); fine artists, art directors and animators (28th); producers and directors (31st); musicians and singers (44th); all artists (45th); architects (47th); writers and authors (47th); actors (48th); designers (49th); and dancers and choreographers (50th).

Of course, as I consider the ramifications of the announcer gap I can’t help but wonder if there’s a better option. Perhaps we should help North Dakota keep its number one ranking and trade it a few announcers in exchange for some writers and authors.


[A]rtists constitute one of the largest classes of workers in the nation…. Artists represent a larger group than the legal profession (lawyers, judges, and paralegals), medical doctors (physicians, surgeons, and dentists), or agricultural workers (farmers, ranchers, foresters, and fishers).

Artists in the Workforce 1990-2005

What about those who aren’t residents of planet Earth?

Reading one of the longer books I’ve undertaken in a while and a string of enjoyable weather has kept me from the blogging world. I think favoring a book and good weather over the electronic world is more than justifiable. And if a recent Random House/Zogby poll is any indication, I’m not alone in at least part of that view.

According to the poll, which has only a 1.1 percent margin of error, 80 percent of the respondents don’t plan to buy an e-book reader and 82 percent would rather curl up with a printed book than one in electronic format, whether online, with an e-book reader or a PDF file. That isn’t the only sign book readers don’t necessarily view the electronic world as conducive. Eighty-five percent have never purchased an e-book and 95 percent have never participated in an online book chat with an author or belonged to an online book group. Nearly a third, however, depend on online book reviews for recommendations and 77 percent buy books online and that is where respondents buy books most often.

Other items I found of interest are that 78 percent buy the books they read while 19 percent borrow them from the library. Half buy fewer than 10 books a year for themselves but more than half buy 1-5 books a year they never get around to reading. Sixty-four percent don’t regularly shop at independent bookstores (which may well be a reflection of availability) but Democrats (40%) and independents (33%) are more likely than Republicans (20%) to regularly do so. More than three-quarters make unplanned book purchases when they go into a book store for a specific book.

And while this may not reflect actual sales, only five percent say Oprah Winfrey makes them want to buy a book whereas eight percent say the same of Jon Stewart. In addition, investors and frequent Wal-Mart shoppers (27% each) are more likely than their counterparts (18% each) to say talk radio makes them want to buy books.

And a finding that is perhaps more puzzling for what it asks rather than what it says: “Respondents who identify themselves as residents of planet earth (62%) are more likely than those who self identify as residents of America or their city or town to agree that book reviews make them want to buy a book.”


A book is a membership card to a secret society — a society of minds, with manifold interpretations and moods and intentions. You enter that society, the book’s lines imprint on your retinas, and your brain will never be the same.

Paul Verhaeghen, Omega Minor

Impeachment politics and the Bar

Politics are undoubtedly a primary topic of debate in bars around the country. It is extremely rare, though, when a political issue becomes a formal topic of debate and discussion for the South Dakota Bar Association. Yet that will be the case when a resolution dealing with the impeachment of Bush and Cheney will be discussed at the Bar’s annual meeting next week in Rapid City.

The Bar Association by-laws allow members to present resolutions at the annual meeting for consideration by the membership. This year, an attorney in Rapid City proposed a resolution that the State Bar recommend Congresswoman Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin “immediately initiate impeachment proceedings” against Bush and Cheney. The rationale? Members of the State Bar are required by law to take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and the president and vice-president have committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” justifying impeachment proceedings. The specific grounds asserted in the resolution are:

  • spying on U.S. citizens without judicial warrant;
  • authorizing rendition and “systematic torture” of human beings;
  • leading the country “into an illegal war of aggression” in Iraq “on false pretenses”;
  • arresting and imprisoning American citizens without charges; and
  • using “defiant signing statements to declare that the President, in his unbridled discretion, is the law.’

In the 20+ years I’ve been a lawyer, this is the first resolution on such a hot button political issue that I can recall (although calling my memory poor is to praise it excessively). I have somewhat mixed feelings as to whether it is an appropriate topic for the state Bar. Despite that, while I’m not going to the bar convention, I probably would vote for the resolution if I were there.

There’s two things I’m fairly certain of, though. One is it takes a lot of mettle and courage of conviction to propose the resolution. The second is that it stands as much chance of success as Congress actually initiating impeachment proceedings against this administration.


[Impeachment proceedings] will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and …. will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will inlist all their animosities, partialities, influence and interest on one side, or on the other[.]

Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 65

Book Review: The Great Derangement by Matt Taibbi

As you can tell from the tone of some of the political posts here, I’m fed up. I’m tired of politics and politicians and revolted by how they elevate self-interest over public interest. It can be therapeutic to see you’re not alone. And Matt Taibbi’s The Great Derangement, also indicates there’s a lot of people out there who feel the same way. It’s just that the disaffection manifests itself in different, at times somewhat deranged, ways.

Often scathing, frequently humorous and usually insightful, Taibbi sees Americans as becoming deranged by the state of political and national affairs. He explores this derangement but what he views as analogous counterparts at either end of the political spectrum — the end times-tinged evangelical movement and the 9/11 Truth Movement. To him, they are prime examples of the factionalization of the so-called blue-red divide stemming from an underlying and growing distrust of politics and government.

The main storyline here is Taibbi joining Cornerstone Church, founded by Pastor John Hagee, the evangelical minister whose endorsement John McCain so proudly trumpeted and then distanced himself from. We follow Taibbi to a church “encounter weekend” which culminates in participants vomiting out the demons that possess them, prayer groups with leaders who make sure to incorporate the church’s political viewpoints, and even street (actually shopping mall) evangelism. While The Great Derangement provides insight to such activities, equally fascinating is Taibbi’s discovery of how he adapts to the culture. He begins to grasp how and why the feelings it creates in members has helped churches like this grow and succeed, politics aside.

Taibbi also joins a meet up group of the 9/11 Truth Movement, which believes the Bush Administration was involved in — or at least aware of and did not stop — the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Although classifying the movement as “a narcissistic pipe dream for a dingbat, sheeplike population,” Taibbi casts it here as a left wing counterpart to the ideas of Hagee and similar evangelicals on the right.

Interspersed with these focal points are trips behind the scenes of the budget process in Washington (which should be required reading for every American) and time Taibbi spent with American troops patrolling the streets of Baghdad. And while Taibbi is no fan of the evangelical right or the Bush Administration, he is an equal opportunity critic. Both parties and the media are frequently excoriated. For example, here’s part of his take on when, nine days after September 11, Bush said America was attacked because of its democracy:

“They hate our freedoms” was possibly the dumbest, most insulting piece of bullshit ever to escape the lips of an American president. As an explanation for the appalling tragedy of 9/11, … it was insufficient even as a calculated effort to snow an uneducated public — it was too stupid even to hold up as that. And yet when he said it, Bush was not savaged by the mainstream media for blowing off the biggest security question of our time. …. Instead, he was cheered as a hero by members of both parties and virtually all the country’s commercial media, which engaged in a kind of frantic race to see who could more enthusiastically compare Bush’s speechmaking to that of Winston Churchill.

Taibbi recognizes that this, sadly, may be par for the course in today’s America. He points out that although the Democrats swept into office in 2006 in response to the Iraq War, Hurricane Katrina and other Bush policies, they have done little or nothing with (or to keep) that mandate. He notes those midterm elections simply produced “a period where the Democrats would prove absolutely that it is possible in America to govern entirely on the appearance of principle — while changing absolutely nothing.” And the key word there is “appearance.” The Democrats have done nothing to change things. Their positions on Iraq, post-9/11 civil liberties and the like were nothing more than hollow rhetoric masquerading as principles. Instead, it remained politics as usual.

While Taibbi ultimately wants to offer at least a ray of hope, I fear the subtitle’s reference to “the Twilight of the American Empire” may be too accurate. And although I share his disgust and dismay, this isn’t going to be the quintessential work for the disaffected. It at times feels somewhat cobbled together from a variety of subjects Taibbi explored as possible book topics and as national affairs correspondent for Rolling Stone magazine. Likewise, while Taibbi decimates the ideas of the 9/11 Truth Movement with his account of an imaginary conspiracy meeting led by Dick Cheney, his reason for categorizing it as a faction on the left seems to go no further than its hatred of Bush. Closer examination of what factors other than disaffection with government gives rise to the popularity of this movement yields to his recounting of arguments with movement proponents.

It may be unlikely The Great Derangement will find a significant audience beyond those already in the choir. (It reached No. 25 on the NYT nonfiction list before disappearing in the latest rankings.) But what the book illustrates is that there is a very large choir out there. It’s just that some are using an evangelical hymnbook, others are singing of grandiose conspiracies and many just go home to watch TV. Unfortunately, the twilight represented by our deranged and broken political system may just become darker and darker.


If there’s one thing you can always count on, it’s that a lefty political activist will find a way to convince himself that he’s changing the world by watching a movie.

Matt Taibbi, The Great Derangement

June book notes

In an effort to resume more standard programming, there’s a couple bookish items on the horizon as we enter June.

First, Sunday marks the official start of Reading the World 2008. This is the fourth year of the program, which aims to introduce American readers to literature in translation. This year, it features 25 books from 15 different publishers, including five books/publishers that were selected by booksellers. Some are classics (Don Quixote or War and Peace); others are contemporary. A handy list of the books with brief summaries is available here.

I’ve actually read three of the books already, two in the last month or so. Those two were Serve the People!, Yan Lianke’s satire on life in Maoist China, and Roberto Bolaño’s Nazi Literature in the Americas, which I reviewed a couple weeks ago. My favorite, though, is Per Petterson’s Out Stealing Horses, which I read and reviewed in January. It remains one of my favorite books this year. Seven other titles have been featured at three percent. It’s certainly worth checking out one or more of these titles.

The second item is more local. Actor Mike Farrell will be in town Monday, June 2, at the local B&N to speak and take questions about his memoir, Just Call Me Mike: A Journey to Actor and Activist. Farrell is best known for his role as B.J. in the television series M*A*S*H. The book, first published last year, was recently updated and released in trade paperback.

Farrell, who will be appearing at 7 p.m., promises to speak on whatever topics to which the audience leads, whether his acting career, his views as a human rights activist or even the presidential campaign, which might be particularly pertinent with the primary election the next day. He is appearing here part of a grassroots-like book tour in which he and his wife, actress Shelley Fabares, are driving from L.A. to New York and back again, making appearances throughout the continental U.S. along the way.


You hear all this whining going on, “Where are our great writers?” The thing I might feel doleful about is: Where are the readers?

Gore Vidal, Esquire

NYC: Witches, phantoms and spam

Posting has been virtually non-existent due to a several day trip to NYC with my three daughters this past week. Between what the hotel wanted to charge for internet access and my preferring to roam the city rather than the web, I was virtually cyber incommunicado.

I am still trying to recover from herding and keeping up with the three girls. It was the first trip there for the younger two and seeing how wide their eyes got the first night in Times Square was alone almost worth the cost. I generally served as direction finder/tour guide and financier. A few random observations from the trip:

  • I am not a fan of musicals but each daughter got to pick the Broadway show they wanted to see, meaning we saw three musicals. While I couldn’t imagine converting a great Python movie into a Broadway musical but Spamalot was truly enjoyable. Wicked not only strayed from the book (which I didn’t like), it was absolutely stunning. But I still don’t understand the fascination with The Phantom of the Opera, now the longest running musical in Broadway history.
  • I almost had to be dragged out of Strand Bookstore. And as might be expected, that was the location of my first personal purchases — three books and a t-shirt.
  • My next personal purchases also reflected my interests — several t-shirts from the NHL Store. It opened last October and was just at the end of the block on 47th Street from our hotel.
  • Most of the food was exceptional, although what may bother me most at some of the highly praised restaurants isn’t the prices but how pretentious they are.
  • As has been the case with every trip I’ve made to NYC, four days or so is about the max of my tolerance. There’s just too many people in too big a hurry to go who knows where. To top it off, it was Fleet Week, meaning there were thousands of sailors and Marines throughout the city.
  • Despite the diversity of culture, food and arts, a NYC trip has always refreshed my perspective on life here and this time perhaps more so than before.

I fart in your general direction!

The French Taunter, Spamalot

End of the week marginalia

Finally, what looks to be an absolutely gorgeous weekend. So, in a quick check of e-mails and the like, here’s some various items to consider in your spare time:


Some folks trust to reason
Others trust to might
I don’t trust to nothing
But I know it come out right

“Playing in the Band,” Grateful Dead (Skull & Roses)

DNC: Who needs a true South Dakota blogger?

So the Democratic National Committee has announced the bloggers from each state who will get floor credentials to cover this summer’s Democratic National Convention. And the pick from South Dakota: Badlands Blue.

Guess that shows what the DNC thinks of South Dakota bloggers or South Dakota. As noted a while ago, Badlands Blue was actually operated by a Democratic Party operative out of Virginia. I haven’t been back to the blog since removing it from my blogroll a couple months ago. But I’m guessing it’s still financed and authorized by the state Democratic Party.

Maybe there weren’t any other applicants to be South Dakota’s convention blogger (I sure as hell didn’t apply). Personally, I would rather South Dakota have no blog representation. But evidently the Democratic Party would rather take a mouthpiece blog than someone with party affiliation who might actually dare to express independent thought. A nice way to uphold the party’s professed — but all too seldom practiced — principles.

Just more reinforcement for my disdain and hatred of political parties and politics as currently practiced in the U.S.


Voting only encourages the bastards.

Variously attributed

Another milestone

This post must go in the perhaps better late than never category. It was drafted over the weekend and the fact it is being posted today reflects just how far it got with the various work and home activity that’s going on.

Anyway, twenty-two years ago this past weekend, my then less than three month old daughter was present when I graduated from law school. The situation was reversed last Saturday as my wife and I (and middle daughter) attended her undergraduate commencement ceremonies. Let’s just say she graduated in less time and with (deservedly) more honors than my undergraduate career.

Surprisingly, seeing her graduate didn’t make me feel any older or seem as . It seemed like just another step in the ongoing process of watching her grow up and become independent. Here’s what made me feel old: how tired I feel from helping her move stuff back home for the summer (before she heads off this fall for grad school at the U of Missouri), the small party we had for her Saturday evening, the return of middle daughter for the summer and the addition of a new dog to the house, all in the course of about three days.

Despite the delay in getting this posted, I’m proud of her accomplishments so far and the fact her career choice is aimed at helping people. That and the joy of seeing her finding her own way in the world far outweigh what it (and the aches and pains) say about how old I’m getting.


Teach your children well

“Teach Your Children,” CSN&Y, Déjà Vu

No lawyers need apply

I received a call at home Tuesday night from an outfit in Michigan whose name I do not recall saying they were looking for a certain number of registered voters to participate in a political focus group. I was initially inclined to tell them to go away but thought maybe it would be interesting to do as I’ve never participated in one and it would take less than three hours one evening this month.

After indicating I would be interested, the woman began gathering general information, such as educational level, age and whether and how I was employed. When I told her where I worked and that I was a lawyer, she said she was sorry but no one associated with the legal system or the courts was eligible to participate.

In hindsight, I wonder if the focus group was for the proposed abortion law or one of the other initiated measures on the November ballot. It makes some sense to my simplistic mind that they may not want a focus group on an initiated law to get caught up in a discussion of legal issues when they’re looking for what concerns and what sells to the average voter.

Or, then again, maybe I’m wrong and they just don’t like lawyers.


It is a besetting vice of democracies to substitute publick opinion for law. This is the usual form in which masses of men exhibit their tyranny.

James Fenimore Cooper, The American Democrat

Which book would I save?

Corey V. asked last week, “Which book would you save?” At first, I was just going to post a comment on his blog. Then, I thought maybe it was worth a quick blog post. I realized, though, that a question like that is far, far too difficult for a comment or quick post.

Corey’s post hits one of the core issues on the head: am I saving the book for society as a whole or is it going to be my “desert island book”? At first blush, you might think the book you save would be the same regardless. But I’m not so sure. For example, I’ve never liked Shakespeare. But do my personal tastes mean that the only book future generations have shouldn’t see Shakespeare’s collected works (or something by Twain or Dickens or Tolstoy)?

I ultimately opted for a blend. I figured I’d pick something I know I’d read but that undoubtedly has both literary and social value. Thus, my choice would be George Orwell’s 1984. If we’re in a situation where we need to talk about saving books, then plainly we would be much closer to Winston Smith’s world than we are today. Society undoubtedly will need both literary quality and useful social/political commentary.

Of course, ask me next week or next month and the answer might well be different.


Orthodoxy means not thinking — not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.

George Orwell, 1984